QKD vs PQC: Selecting The Best Quantum Safe Solution

January 15, 2026

Quantum computing is no longer a distant prospect; it is a fast-approaching disruptor to the cryptographic foundations of the internet. The same computational power that promises breakthroughs in science and artificial intelligence also threatens to render today’s encryption obsolete. As governments, enterprises and network operators prepare for this shift, two technologies have emerged as leading countermeasures: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC).

QKD harnesses the principles of quantum physics to distribute keys using photons, particles of light that change state when observed. In theory, this allows two parties to detect any eavesdropping attempt in real time. However, QKD depends on specialist optical hardware such as lasers, photon detectors and dedicated fibre links, making it complex and costly to deploy at scale.

PQC, by contrast, takes a different approach. It replaces traditional mathematical problems like factoring and elliptic curves with new, quantum-resistant ones, most notably lattice‑based. These can run efficiently on existing CPUs, FPGAs and ASICs, allowing organisations to harden current networks against future quantum attacks without overhauling their infrastructure.

In short, both QKD and PQC aim to future-proof data in motion, but they take very different paths. Understanding where each fits is essential to building a practical, quantum-safe roadmap today. Let’s take a look at both approaches.

What is Quantum Key Distribution (QKD)?

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is a method of securely exchanging encryption keys by using the fundamental laws of quantum physics. Instead of relying on mathematical assumptions, QKD encodes cryptographic keys into quantum states of light, typically individual photons, that travel along an optical fibre or free-space channel. Because measuring a quantum state inevitably disturbs it, any attempt to intercept the transmission introduces detectable anomalies. This means that the two communicating parties can verify whether a key exchange has been compromised before using the key to encrypt data.

The key idea behind QKD is that it provides tamper evidence by design. If an eavesdropper tries to intercept or measure the quantum signals, the disturbance increases the quantum bit error rate (QBER), alerting the system to a potential breach. When implemented correctly, the resulting key can be proven to be secret, independent of the computational power of any adversary, even a quantum computer.

In theory, QKD offers information-theoretic security, meaning its protection does not depend on the hardness of a mathematical problem but on the immutable principles of quantum mechanics. This makes it a compelling option for organisations requiring the highest levels of assurance in key exchange, particularly over short, controlled optical links where physical infrastructure can be tightly managed.

Benefits

Eavesdrop-detection by design

Measuring quantum states disturbs them, so an attacker shows up as a higher error rate (QBER). That gives you tamper evidence during key establishment.

Information-theoretic key secrecy (under the model)

With ideal devices and proper post-processing (error correction + privacy amplification), the generated key can be provably secret, independent of adversary compute power.

Good fit for controlled, short optical links

In metro/backbone segments with dark fibre and tight physical security, QKD can add a high-assurance layer for site-to-site keying.

Limitations:

Limited range and scalability

Photons in standard fibre are absorbed and scattered; only about 10 % of photons travel more than 50 km, and only 0.01 % travel past 200 km. Extending range requires ultra‑low‑loss fibre and specialised repeaters; experimental demonstrations have achieved longer distances but remain costly and not widely available.

Specialised hardware & cost

QKD needs dedicated lasers and photon detectors and often these requirements drive high capital expenditure and major infrastructure changes

No built‑in authentication

QKD alone does not prove the identity of the communicating parties; it must be combined with classical or post‑quantum cryptographic mechanisms to authenticate the source, otherwise a man‑in‑the‑middle attack is possible.

Deployment complexity & susceptibility

QKD channels are fragile; even inadvertent vibrations or deliberate tapping can cause the channel to abort and keys to be discarded.

Security in practice

Real‑world QKD systems have been plagued by implementation attacks such as side‑channel exploits and denial‑of‑service; moreover, QKD works reliably only over fibre or free‑space optics and is not feasible over typical wireless links.

Conclusions on QKD

In practice, QKD remains a niche technology. Its specialised optical hardware, high deployment cost and limited range make it suitable only for short, high-value connections where physical infrastructure can be tightly controlled. Typical use cases include financial trading networks, critical infrastructure control systems and defence communications, where the highest assurance justifies the expense. While QKD demonstrates the remarkable potential of quantum physics in cybersecurity, its practical adoption is restricted to specific, point-to-point scenarios rather than large-scale or cloud-based networks.

What is Post‑Quantum Cryptography (PQC)?

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) refers to a new generation of cryptographic algorithms designed to remain secure even against powerful quantum computers. Instead of relying on the factoring or elliptic-curve problems that quantum algorithms can easily break, PQC uses mathematical puzzles that are believed to resist both classical and quantum attacks. These include lattice-based, hash-based, and code-based constructions. Because PQC runs on standard processors and hardware accelerators, it can be deployed through software updates or integrated into existing systems, providing a practical path to quantum-safe encryption across today’s global networks.

Benefits

Authenticates transmissions:

PQC algorithms can generate digital signatures or certificates that authenticate the sender, eliminating the need for separate authentication channels.

Standardisation & support:

ML‑KEM (key encapsulation), ML‑DSA (digital signatures) SLH‑DSA (hash‑based signatures) are the latest standards from NIST. National governments and agencies such as the NSA, the NCSC and the cybersecurity bodies of the British, French, German, Dutch, Swedish and Czech governments have all stated a clear choice of PQC over QKD.

Limitations

Large keys and computational overhead:

Some PQC schemes require much larger keys than today’s cryptosystems and can increase storage and processing overhead; resource‑constrained devices may need upgrades or hardware acceleration.

Algorithm maturity:

Several PQC candidates are still being evaluated, and some experimental schemes — such as the Supersingular Isogeny Key Encapsulation algorithm (SIKE) — have been broken by classical attacks.

Conclusions on PQC

Despite a few limitations such as larger key sizes and higher computational overhead, Post-Quantum Cryptography remains the only practical path to securing Internet-scale communications against quantum threats. Its algorithms can be deployed through software or hardware updates across existing infrastructure, making PQC the foundation for real-world quantum-safe encryption. As global standards mature and adoption accelerates, PQC enables organisations to protect data in motion today while remaining resilient to the quantum challenges of tomorrow.

QKD vs PQC: At a Glance

The table below summarises how QKD and PQC compare across critical categories.

Use cases: where each technology fits

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is best suited for:

• Securing site‑to‑site links: QKD can add quantum‑grade key distribution to encrypted tunnels between high‑value sites (e.g., data‑centre interconnects).
• Short backbone segments: It can protect short optical fibre links between cities or cloud regions, provided dedicated fibre is available.
• High‑value transactions and critical control links: Banks, utilities or defence networks may consider QKD to ensure real‑time commands cannot be tapped.
• Research & niche use: Governments and some national programmes (e.g., China and South Korea) are experimenting with QKD networks, but these are costly and limited.

Post‑Quantum Cryptography (PQC) applies broadly:

• Quantum‑safe IPsec, TLS and VPNs: PQC upgrades current key exchange and signature algorithms in Internet and private WAN traffic.
• Securing routers and network control planes: PQC can protect routing protocols and device firmware, enabling quantum‑resilient control and management traffic.
• Cloud and multi‑site data migration: It ensures encrypted transfers between cloud regions or providers remain safe even decades from now.
• Resilient SD‑WAN overlays and partner interconnects: PQC provides high‑speed, quantum‑resistant encryption across dynamic multi‑site networks.
• Edge and IoT deployments: Software‑based PQC can run on a wide range of devices; hardware‑accelerated platforms like Sitehop’s SAFEcore can deliver sub‑microsecond latency.

Conclusion & next steps

Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) provides the most practical and scalable route to quantum-safe security today. Its ability to integrate with existing networks, hardware and encryption standards makes it the clear choice for protecting data in motion across global infrastructures, including telecom backbones, data centres, critical industrial control systems and cloud environments.

While QKD offers unique advantages for tightly controlled, high-assurance optical links, PQC delivers the flexibility and performance required for Internet-scale protection.

If you are planning your quantum-safe migration strategy or want to understand how PQC can enhance your network architecture, contact Sitehop for expert advice and tailored solutions.

 

To find out more, discover our QKD vs PQC review here.

Or email info@sitehop.com

Or call us: +44 (0)114 478 2366

Sitehop.

Engineered for speed. Built for the future.